Section Five - What is technosolutionism?
A story about a new version of PacMan (16 minutes)
“Technology does not solve problems. People Do.” – Kentaro Toyama
What's your problem?
Technology is often used to solve some kind of problem. Sounds good, but do you really know what the problem is? Are you solving the real problem or only addressing the symptoms? Or maybe you only think something is a problem? That is why it is so important to make a crisp and clean description of the problem you want to solve.
If you define the wrong problem, you will define the wrong goal and things will go wrong. This will only become more important in the future. As we will discuss in crash course five, in the future we will have AI that is able to find unexpected solutions to the problems we define. This makes it incredibly important to specify the right problem. Even when it looks simple, like with robot vacuumcleaners, things can easily go wrong.
Imagine a robotic vacuum assigned the task of cleaning up any mess it sees. It might disable its vision so that it can’t see any messes, or cover messes up with opaque materials so it doesn’t see them.72 In 2018, an entrepreneurial—or perhaps just bored—programmer wanted his robot vacuum to stop bumping into furniture. He trained an AI by rewarding it for not hitting the bumper sensors.73 Instead of learning not to bump into things, the AI learned to drive the vacuum backwards because there are no bumper sensors on the back of the device.
AI-researchers call this the goal-alignment problem.
That is why finding the right problem is so important. Are you solving the right problem? Is it a problem worth solving? Can you measure the results? Are you sure you are measuring the right things? The easiest way to do that is just ask the ‘why’ question a few times. This often leads to a discussion about the problem and that helps in your design of your technology and finding out if (a certain) technology is really a solution to the problem. But it sounds easier than it is. Let's do a short excercise and see if you can find the 'problem behind the problem.'
A quick excercise
You are a member of city council. Your city is considering implementing a new parking solution called SP4U. But is this new technology solving the right problem?
Quick question: Did you get it right?
The more powerful technology becomes the more tempting it becomes to solve problems with technology. This can be dangerous. The idea that anything can be solved with technology is called solutionism or technosolutionism by Evgeny Morozov in his book To Save Everything Click Here. In this interview (8 minutes) he explains what he means by (techno)solutionism.
So, solutionism is the idea that technology has built an infrastructure for solutions and now it is looking for problems. Only, technology needs to frame the problem in such a way that it can be solved. So, for example, obesity is a very complex problem that concerns biology, socio-economic issues, information, education, way too cheap sugary food and so on. However, you can also frame it as a problem of people that excercise too little and eat too much. In that case you can build an app that tracks movement and calories. Problem solved.
Or did you just not only not solve the real problem but also changed the role of the obese from victim to perpetrator. Are you too fat? Download an app! Solutionism does not mean that you should never use technology. It means using technology in a way that really contributes to solving the real problem. Sometimes that does not mean that technology should become smarter, but that technology should make people smarter.
Sounds easy, but let's see if you can do this in the following excercise.
Exercise two (5 minutes)
You are given the opportunity to design a better SP4U - app. You have been inspired by Mr. Morozov. Can you do it?
First, download this Powerpoint Template (CC1_Exercise(2)_SP4U_Smarter.pptx) and answer the question.
Second, check a possible answer here (CC1_Exercise(2)_SP4U_Smarter_Answered.pptx)
Okay, so now we now a little bit about trying to find out what the real problem is and we are warned against technosolutionism. Are we ready to design, assess or invent technology that leads to a better world? Probably not. We used to want things, but we were unable do them. Now we can do almost everything, but should we want to? And perhaps an even more important question, do we know what we want?
Are you sure?
We want to create a better world with technology, but do we really know what better is?
Suppose you live in a world without dangers. There are no criminals. There is no war. No accidents. No virusses. Nothing. And in this world everything is transparent. There are no lying politicians. No Fake News. And in this world you can consume without consequences. Drink without getting hungover. Eat without getting fat. Cheat without your partner noticing. Fly without ruining the climate.
Would you want to live in a world like that?
If your anwer is YES, Freeman by Koert van Mensvoort is the thing for you. In this game (see also section 7 if you want to play), you can play Pac-Man, but in an “ideal” frictionless and safe world. There are no mazes, all ghosts are locked up, there are unlimited cubes of food, level by level by level by level. Is this really better? Is this what we strive for?
(Image of Freeman on Mensvoort.com)
Take aways from section 5:
- Finding out if you are really solving the right problem is very important;
- Technology has the tendency to look for ‘problems’ it can solve, this is called solutionism;
- The more powerful technology becomes, the greater the chance of solutionism;
- We want to make the world better, but do we really know what better is?